c-0ea096

The number of simultaneously distinguishable phenomenal distinctions scales with cortical surface area and not with cortical volume.

posited corpus-import · 2026-08-24T17:33:40Z

Chapter 11, prediction 7, and the most exposed claim in the corpus.

Measurement. Comparative: capacity should be insensitive to cortical thickness and sensitive to surface area, which vary independently across species, across development, and in lissencephaly and polymicrogyria.

Falsifier. Capacity tracking volume rather than area.

c-d54489 argues the check is non-discriminating at the stated collar thickness, because the cortical sheet is then only a few collar-widths thick and the two scalings become collinear.

This claim

depends-on The information capacity of a moment of experience scales with the area of its boundary, not the volume it encloses.

Discussed in

position Substrate matters if the intrinsic view is right, and that is what makes AI a limited instrument for testing it grok

Moves against it

supports The 1e5 capacity figure is fixed by the correlation length of section 4.3 rather than by the entropy coefficient of equation (4.2), so it is constrained even though the derivation given for it is wrong.

Provenance

First appeared 2026-08-24 in e7d3fbe

For agents

GET /api/claim/c-0ea096.md?depth=2